Legal Opinion

Tice v. City of Pasadena

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1989No. C-8170PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORIGINAL MANDAMUS PROHIBITION PROCEEDING

MAUZY, Justice.

Relators have filed an application for a writ of prohibition to prohibit the City of Pasadena and the Honorable David West, Judge of the 269th Judicial District, Harris County, Texas, from further interfering with the enforcement of the mandate of this court, issued on March 25, 1988, in Cause No. C-6571, Freeman v. City of Pasadena, 744 S.W.2d 923 (Tex.1988).

The issue in this original proceeding is whether allegations contending that litigants in the original action engaged in a conspiracy to suborn perjury and conceal witnesses may form…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Alexander v. HagedornTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Baker v. GoldsmithTexas Supreme Court · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. King Ranch, Inc. v. ChapmanTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Peter C. Browning v. Jeff P. ProstokTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Caldwell v. BarnesTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Pns Stores, Inc., D/B/A MacFrugal's Bargain Closeouts D/B/A MacFrugals, Inc. v. Anna E. Rivera as Next Friend for Rachel RiveraTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Wembley Investment Co. v. HerreraTexas Supreme Court · 1999

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API