Wembley Investment Co. v. Herrera
Texas Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Wembley Investment Company seeks to set aside a default judgment by bill of review. The trial court granted Wembley summary judgment on the bill of review, but the court of appeals reversed, holding that Wembley failed to prove as a matter of law that it was diligent in pursuing a ruling on its motion for new trial while the default judgment remained interlocutory. 12 S.W.3d 83. We hold that, because Wembley timely filed its motion for new trial and, by the accidents or wrongful acts of others, was unaware that the default judgment had become final, the court of appeals erred in reversing the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. TippsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Cliff v. HugginsTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Alexander v. HagedornTexas Supreme Court · 1950
- Caldwell v. BarnesTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Petro-Chemical Transport, Inc. v. CarrollTexas Supreme Court · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by209 opinions
- Frost National Bank v. FernandezTexas Supreme Court · 2010
- Gold v. GoldTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- McIntyre v. Wilson, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2001
- Mabon Ltd. v. Afri-Carib Enterprises, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2012
- Campus Investments, Inc. v. CulleverTexas Supreme Court · 2004
204 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.