Trump. v. International Refugee Assistance Project
Supreme Court of the United States
1Per curiam
These cases involve challenges to Executive Order No. 13780, Protecting the Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry Into the United States. The order alters practices concerning the entry of foreign nationals *2083 into the United States by, among other things, suspending entry of nationals from six designated countries for 90 days. Respondents challenged the order in two separate lawsuits. They obtained preliminary injunctions barring enforcement of several of its provisions, including the 90-day suspension of entry. The injunctions were upheld in large measure by the Courts of Appeals.
The Government…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by163 opinions
- State of California v. the Little Sisters of the PoorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Intl Refugee Assistance v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
- Faour Fraihat v. US Imm. & Customs EnforcementCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- City & County of San Francisco v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Aracely v. NielsenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
158 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.