Legal Opinion

People v. Fuqua

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 7, 1988No. 87SA118PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Chief Justice.

The People appeal from a judgment which construed Crim.P. 35(b) as authorizing a sentencing court to retain jurisdiction for the purpose of deciding a motion for reduction of sentence filed within 120 days following the imposition of sentence but not decided by the court until sometime after the expiration of the 120-day filing period mandated by the rale. We vacate the judgment of the district court and remand the case for further proceedings.

I

The facts are not in dispute. On January 11,1985, the defendant, Glenne Fuqua, was sentenced to a term of twenty-three years as a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. District Court, Second Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. People v. GuentherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  3. United States v. Ersel StollingsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
  4. Colorado Common Cause v. MeyerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  5. United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Brody v. HellmanColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Delgado v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  3. People v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  4. United States v. Landeros-ArreolaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  5. Mamula v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API