Legal Opinion

Mamula v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 8, 1993No. 91SC801PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rovira

We granted certiorari to consider the court of appeals opinion in People v. Mamula, No. 90CA2013 (Colo.App. Sept. 12, 1991) (not selected for official publication), holding that petitioner abandoned his reduction of sentence motion pursuant to Crim.P. 35(b) as a matter of law by failing to pursue it in a timely manner. We affirm.

I

Petitioner was charged with six felonies and one misdemeanor. On August 22, 1988, he pleaded guilty to three counts of second degree burglary, and the remaining charges were dismissed. Petitioner was originally sentenced to probation for two years. Shortly…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. FullerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  2. Alfred B. Diggs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  3. People v. HerreraSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  4. People v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  5. People v. FuquaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. KristlCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  2. Delgado v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  3. State v. PhilippsNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. William Franklin WolfeIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Herr v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API