Legal Opinion

United States v. Landeros-Arreola

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 27, 2001No. 00-50512PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge:

David Landeros-Arreola (“Landeros”) pleaded guilty to re-entering the United States illegally, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1826. At sentencing, the district court determined that Landeros’s prior Colorado felony conviction for menacing constituted an aggravated felony, which subjected him to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2’s1 penalty enhancement. On appeal, Landeros challenges this determination. Additionally, Landeros asserts that his sentence violated his due process rights because it exceeded the statutory maximum sentence, or, alternatively, that § 1326(b)(2) is an…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. MarekCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  2. People v. ZapotockySupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  3. United States v. Galvan-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  4. People v. FuquaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  5. United States v. Fernando MoralesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. United States v. ReynaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. Jesus Martin Caicedo-CueroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. Medina-AnicacioCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. Carlos Moreno-CisnerosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API