Legal Opinion
Stewart-Warner Corporation v. Staley
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 21, 1941No. 3342PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.
The original defendant in this case, Universal Lubricating Systems, Inc., filed :a motion on April 1, 1941, for leave to file an amended counterclaim herein. On May 8, 1941, the plaintiff filed a motion to strike the defendant’s amended counterclaim, and to dismiss it. The case then came on to be heard on June 9, 1941, at which time this court heard the motion to file this amended counterclaim, and allowed it to be filed nunc pro tunc as of April 1, 1941, hearing the case then on plaintiff’s motion to strike and tc dismiss 'this amended counterclaim.
In the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Standard Sanitary Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Standard Oil Co. (Indiana) v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Emack v. KaneUnited States Circuit Court · 1888
- Straus and Straus v. American Publishers' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Maytag Co. v. Meadows Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Louisiana Farmers' Protective Union, Inc. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- United States v. Association of American RailroadsDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1945
- Hartford-Empire Co. v. Glenshaw Glass Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1942
- Hans Oetiker v. Jurid Werke Gmbh. Hans Oetiker v. Jurid Werke GmbhCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- East Crossroads Center, Inc. v. Mellon-Stuart Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.