Legal Opinion
Maytag Co. v. Meadows Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 4, 1930No. 4392PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, District Judge.
In Maytag Co. v. Meadows Mfg. Co., 35 F.(2d) 403, we affirmed an interlocutory decree of the District court, denying plaintiff’s prayer for relief and finding that defendant had sustained the allegations in its answer, praying, as affirmative relief, an injunction enjoining plaintiff from circulating throughout the country false defamatory propaganda concerning defendant, its business and its product; that defendant was entitled to recover from plaintiff because of latter’s said wrongful action; and that the cause should be referred to a master to determine sueh…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Somerville's Executors v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Camp v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Kinney-Coastal Oil Co. v. KiefferSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- National Refining Co. v. Benzo Gas Motor Fuel Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Campbell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Big O Tire Dealers, Inc., a Colorado Corporation v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- Barlow v. International Harvester CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
- New York Times Company v. SullivanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
- Johnson Publishing Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- Advanced Training Systems Inc. v. Caswell Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.