Legal Opinion
Hans Oetiker v. Jurid Werke Gmbh. Hans Oetiker v. Jurid Werke Gmbh
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 19, 1982No. 81-1427, 81-1489PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARKEY, Chief Judge:
Hans Oetiker (Oetiker) appeals from a judgment' of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia dismissing his claim that Jurid Werke GmbH (Jurid) procured U.S. Patent 3,321,811 (’811 patent) by fraud on the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) and misused the ’811 patent in violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. § 2). Jurid cross appeals the district court’s refusal to award it attorneys fees. We affirm.
Background
Oetiker, a Swiss resident and citizen, is engaged in the manufacture and sale of clamps and couplings in various countries, including…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Otter Tail Power Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Delong Corporation v. Raymond International, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Kobe, Inc. v. Dempsey Pump Co. Dempsey Pump Co. v. Kobe, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- Mitchell v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Loctite Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Ultraseal Ltd., Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Orthopedic Equipment Company, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. All Orthopedic Appliances, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Bayer Aktiengesellschaft v. Duphar International Research B.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- In Re Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
- Oetiker v. Jurid Werke, GmbHDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.