Hartford-Empire Co. v. Glenshaw Glass Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.
The complaint discloses that plaintiff is seeking to recover royalties alleged to be due plaintiff on a series of license-agreements covering feeders, which are devices used in the process of manufacturing glass —six known as “Howard Feeders,” and four known as “Hartford Feeders.”
By answer, defendant asserts, as a defense to plaintiff’s claim for royalties under the six Howard licenses, an equitable rescission of these license-agreements. As a defense to the entire cause of action, the answer avers that all of the license-agreements sued upon are an inherent,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- A. G. Reeves Steel Const. Co. v. WeissCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Emery v. Third Nat. Bank of Pbg.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Emery v. Third Nat. Bk. of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- McGrann v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Ring v. SpinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Gossard v. GossardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
- Baysinger v. HanserSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
- Gutor International Ag v. Raymond Packer Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
- Brown Et Ux v. Hassenstab Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1957
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.