Legal Opinion

Ruberg v. Brown

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 3, 1905PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Before DanTzeEr, J., Bamberg, Action by Theodore Ruberg against Simon Brown and Pena Brown. Prom- Circuit decree defendants appeal. The following indorsement appears on the back of the agreement between the Brown Mercantile and Banking Co. and Mrs. Elizabeth Ruberg: “Eor value received I hereby assign the within agreement and the money secured thereby and all my right, title and interest in the same to Theodore Ruberg.

Read the full summary

Before DanTzeEr, J., Bamberg, Action by Theodore Ruberg against Simon Brown and Pena Brown. Prom- Circuit decree defendants appeal. The following indorsement appears on the back of the agreement between the Brown Mercantile and Banking Co. and Mrs. Elizabeth Ruberg: “Eor value received I hereby assign the within agreement and the money secured thereby and all my right, title and interest in the same to Theodore Ruberg. “Witness my hand and seal this 3 day of July, 1902. “Elizabeth H. Ruberg. (Y. s.)” The following is the indorsement on the bond secured by the Zorn mortgage : “For and in…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Ci-iiee Justice Pope.

The plaintiff seeks a recovery of a judgment for $776.57, with interest on $100 from the 24th of March, 1891, and on the balance from December 1, 1898, and costs; and against both defendants that they may be foreclosed of all interests in the Zorn premises; that said premises may be sold and the proceeds of sale applied to the payment of the expenses of said sale, the costs of this action and the plaintiff’s debt, together with interest on $1,800, the mortgage debt of J. B. Zorn, at eight per cent, per annum, payable annually,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. McGee v. F. W. Poe Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  2. J. L. Mott Iron Works v. ClarkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
  3. Cozi Investments v. SchneiderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  4. Bank of Picher v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Hudepohl Brewing Co. v. BannisterDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API