Cozi Investments v. Schneider
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
This action was brought by respondent Cozi Investments against appellants Stanley A. Schneider and Leonard L. Merl, d/b/a Schneider and Merl Associates to recover actual damages based on a lease guaranty agreement. The issue on appeal is whether the lower court correctly found that personal and subject matter jurisdiction exists as to appellants. We affirm.
The order of the lower court properly sets forth and resolves all questions presented by this appeal and is adopted, with minor modifications, as the opinion of this Court:
ORDER OF JUDGE EPPES
The facts of the case are as follows. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Boney v. Trans-State Dredging Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
- Carroll County Savings Bank v. StrotherSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1888
- McGee v. F. W. Poe Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
- Nucor Corp. v. Fanevil Construction Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
- Jacobs v. Ass'n of Independent Colleges & SchoolsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Nine Mile Limited, D/B/A Serco Administrators and American Warranty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- CB ASKINS v. Firedoor Corp. of Fla.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Hume v. Durwood Medical Clinic, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Moosally v. WW Norton & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- Hidria, USA, Inc. v. DeloCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.