Bank of Picher v. Harris
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
STEPHENSON, O.
Tbe defendant executed and delivered bis promissory note to tbe plaintiff in tbe principal sum of $750, with interest at tbe rate of 10 per cent, per annum, and gave bis mortgage on certain real estate improvements to secure tbe payment. As a part of tbe original transaction, tbe defendant caused an insurance policy to be issued on the improvements, with a loss payable clause in favor of tbe plaintiff, and pledged tbe policy with tbe plaintiff as additional security. Tbe defendant made default in payment of tbe note and mortgage. Later the improvements were destroyed…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Griggs v. . DayNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Wright v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Furness v. Union National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
- Nelson v. First Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
- Abbott v. DoaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Spadaro v. Chenango County National Bank & Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1935
- Redcorn v. KnoxCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
- Leeper v. EadsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935