Legal Opinion

Himelstein v. Arrow Cab

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 3, 1997No. 668, Sept. Term, 1996PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRITY, Judge (retired),

Specially Assigned.

This matter involves the payment of a default judgment through a garnishee, the Motor Vehicle Administration (MVA), which held a security letter of credit posted on behalf of an unincorporated taxicab association for the purpose of participating in the Maryland Self-Insurance Program. We are asked to determine whether the security interest posted by the association is an asset held by the MVA that may be garnished to satisfy the liability of the unincorporated association — trading as Arrow Cab — as an entity, or whether the security is an asset of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Heat & Power Corp. v. Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  2. Dorf v. SkolnikCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  3. Rubin v. WeissmanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  4. Rentals Unlimited, Inc. v. AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY INSURANCE CO.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  5. Van Wyk, Inc. v. Fruitrade International, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Andy's Ice Cream, Inc. v. City of SalisburyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. Maryland Environmental Trust v. GaynorCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Arrow Cab v. HimelsteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  4. Arrow Cab v. HimelsteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  5. Maryland Environmental Trust v. GaynorCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API