Legal Opinion

Dorf v. Skolnik

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 11, 1977No. [No. 153, September Term, 1976.]PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

We shall here give the reasons for the per curiam order we filed in this matter on January 28, 1977. We there affirmed the determination of a trial judge (Proctor, J.) that one of the appellants, Jayme Dorf (Miss Dorf), is no longer a member of the Democratic State Central Committee for the 42nd Legislative District and, as a consequence, that the Governor of Maryland might not appoint the nominee of that committee, as such nominee, to fill a then existing vacancy in the Maryland House of Delegates.

The scenario begins with the death of Murray Abramson, a longtime member of the House of…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Colegrove v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1854
  4. Maryland Committee for Fair Representation v. Tawes, Governor & Board of State CanvassersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  5. Anderson v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1865

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Davis v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  2. Mary Lankford, in her official capacity as Sublette County Clerk v. Paul Rock, Dari Quirk, & Ernest KawaWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Comptroller of the Treasury, Income Tax Division v. HaskinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  4. Blount v. BostonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  5. Toll v. MorenoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API