Legal Opinion
Arrow Cab v. Himelstein
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided February 9, 1998No. 39, Sept. Term, 1997PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT L. KARWACKI, Judge (retired),
Specially Assigned.
The question presented in this case is whether a claimant may satisfy a default judgment entered against an unincorporated association of taxicab permit holders by filing a writ of garnishment against the Motor Vehicle Administration (“MVA”), attaching a letter of credit that was posted with the MVA as security pursuant to the Maryland Self-Insurance Program. Pursuant to regulations promulgated by the MVA, taxicab owners are permitted to form associations to establish the requisite number of vehicles required in order to participate in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance v. GartelmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Board of Trustees v. John K. Ruff, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- ARA Health Services, Inc. v. Department of Public Safety & Correctional ServicesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Rentals Unlimited, Inc. v. AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY INSURANCE CO.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Himelstein v. Arrow CabCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brethren Mutual Insurance v. BuckleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Andy's Ice Cream, Inc. v. City of SalisburyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Buckley v. Brethren Mutual InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Maryland Environmental Trust v. GaynorCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Arrow Cab v. HimelsteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.