Legal Opinion
Arrow Cab v. Himelstein
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided February 9, 1998No. 39, Sept. Term, 1997Published
1Opinion of the Court
705 A.2d 294 (1998)
348 Md. 558
ARROW CAB
v.
Michelle HIMELSTEIN.
No. 39, Sept. Term, 1997.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
February 9, 1998.
Steven J. Potter (Morton Edelstein, on brief), Baltimore, for Petitioner.
Samuel Sperling, Andrea C. Babest (Leonard J. Sperling, Sperling & Framm, on brief), Baltimore, for Respondent.
Argued before BELL, C.J., ELDRIDGE, RODOWSKY, CHASANOW and RAKER, JJ., and JOHN F. McAULIFFE and ROBERT L. KARWACKI, Judges (retired), Specially Assigned.
ROBERT L. KARWACKI, Judge (retired), Specially Assigned.
The question presented in this case is whether a claimant may satisfy a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance v. GartelmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Board of Trustees v. John K. Ruff, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- ARA Health Services, Inc. v. Department of Public Safety & Correctional ServicesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Rentals Unlimited, Inc. v. AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY INSURANCE CO.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Arrow Cab v. HimelsteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.