Terrazas v. Ramirez
Texas Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceGonzalez, Justice
I join in Sections I, IIA, III (except the conclusion that the Attorney General acted within his authority in settling the suit) and IV of the plurality opinion. However, I write separately because I disagree that the Attorney General has the power to settle redistricting suits. In my opinion, the purported settlement violates the separation of powers doctrine.1
*727I begin by noting several relevant circumstances that shape this case: 1) the “new” Senate reapportionment plan increases by three the number of predominately Mexican-American senatorial districts; 2) the time period within which the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Acker v. Texas Water CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- Burns v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. MeierSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Connor v. FinchSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.