Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Terrazas v. Ramirez

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1991No. D-1817Published

1ConcurrenceGonzalez, Justice

I join in Sections I, IIA, III (except the conclusion that the Attorney General acted within his authority in settling the suit) and IV of the plurality opinion. However, I write separately because I disagree that the Attorney General has the power to settle redistricting suits. In my opinion, the purported settlement violates the separation of powers doctrine.1

*727I begin by noting several relevant circumstances that shape this case: 1) the “new” Senate reapportionment plan increases by three the number of predominately Mexican-American senatorial districts; 2) the time period within which the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Acker v. Texas Water CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Burns v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Chapman v. MeierSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Connor v. FinchSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API