Acker v. Texas Water Commission
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DOGGETT, Justice.
The vital issue in this case is whether the decisionmaking of a state agency in a contested administrative case should be done openly or secretly. We believe the law requires openness.
Charles M. Acker received a favorable recommendation from the hearings examiner at the Texas Water Commission on a requested permit for a wastewater treatment plant. Thereafter, during a recess of a public hearing conducted by the three member Commission, Commissioners Hopkins and Roming were allegedly overheard conversing about this application in a restroom. This purported discussion…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Cox Enterprises v. Bd. of Tr. of Austin ISDTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- McBride v. ClaytonTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- Gordon v. LakeTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Conley v. Daughters of the RepublicTexas Supreme Court · 1913
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by604 opinions
- Entergy Gulf States, Inc. v. SummersTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- Leland v. BrandalTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- Railroad Commission v. Texas Citizens for a Safe Future & Clean WaterTexas Supreme Court · 2011
- Wichita County, Texas v. HartTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Jones v. FowlerTexas Supreme Court · 1998
599 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.