Legal Opinion

Acker v. Texas Water Commission

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1990No. C-9031PublishedCited by 604 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DOGGETT, Justice.

The vital issue in this case is whether the decisionmaking of a state agency in a contested administrative case should be done openly or secretly. We believe the law requires openness.

Charles M. Acker received a favorable recommendation from the hearings examiner at the Texas Water Commission on a requested permit for a wastewater treatment plant. Thereafter, during a recess of a public hearing conducted by the three member Commission, Commissioners Hopkins and Roming were allegedly overheard conversing about this application in a restroom. This purported discussion…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Cox Enterprises v. Bd. of Tr. of Austin ISDTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. McBride v. ClaytonTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Gordon v. LakeTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Conley v. Daughters of the RepublicTexas Supreme Court · 1913

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by604 opinions

  1. Entergy Gulf States, Inc. v. SummersTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Leland v. BrandalTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Railroad Commission v. Texas Citizens for a Safe Future & Clean WaterTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Wichita County, Texas v. HartTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Jones v. FowlerTexas Supreme Court · 1998

599 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API