Legal Opinion
Herbert Jack Jessup v. United States Parole Commission F. Scott, Warden, F.C.I., Safford, Arizona
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 13, 1989No. 88-2665PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:
After Herbert Jack Jessup was convicted of counterfeiting while on parole from his five-year sentence for tax evasion, the United States Parole Commission (“Commission”) revoked Jessup’s parole and ruled that the time Jessup spent on parole, his “street time,” would not be credited as time served. The district court subsequently granted Jessup’s petition for habe-as corpus relief on the ground that the Commission failed to advise Jessup before the parole revocation hearing of the possible forfeiture of his street time. The Commission argues on appeal that the district…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Armando John Vargas v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Johnny Honeycutt v. Benjamin Ward, Commissioner of Corrections for the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Leonard Vanes v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Marvin Raines v. U.S. Parole Commission Robert J. ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Luis Alvarez-Mendez v. Fred J. Stock, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Barry Alan Robbins v. Robert Christianson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- James Arnold Smith v. Jack R. Duckworth, and the Indiana Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Jose Eduardo Camacho v. O. Ivan White, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Phoenix, ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Patrick R. Rizzo v. Sandra B. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.