Legal Opinion

Rico Import Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 30, 1972No. 5453, C.A.D. 1075PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AlmoNd, Judge.

This appeal by Pico Import Co. involves the importation of tubular tubular sections of the arundo donax plant which are used in the manufacture of reeds for musical instruments. The goods were classified as articles of “unspun fibrous vegetable materials” under item 222.64 of •the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS), dutiable atlO percent ad valorem. Appellant importer protested this classification and claimed that the merchandise should have been classified under item 200.40 as “wood sticks (except bamboo and rattan sticks) in the rough” or, alternatively, under item…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rico Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  2. J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  3. Rico Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rico Import Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  2. Intercontinental Marble Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
  3. Corning Glass Works v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
  4. Inter-Pacific Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
  5. Berns & Koppstein v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API