Legal Opinion

Rico Products Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 23, 1960No. C.D. 2159PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mollison, Judge:

In a decision reported as J. E. Bernard & Company, Inc. v. United States, 41 Cust Ct. 1, C.D. 2011, this court held, that certain sticks cut from a reed known as Arundo donax were “in the rough” and entitled to free entry under the provisions of paragraph 1806 of the Tariff Act of 1930, providing for—

Woods: Sticks of partridge, hair wood, pimento, orange, myrtle, bamboo, rattan, india malaeea joints, and other woods not specially provided for, in the rough, or not further advanced than cut into lengths suitable for sticks for umbrellas, parasols, sunshades, whips, fishing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cone v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. United States v. WinterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  3. United States v. BennecheCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. American Mannex Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Rico Import Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  3. National Lead Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
  4. Rico Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  5. Rico Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API