Legal Opinion

In re Lifshitz

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 23, 2017No. 16-BG-704Published

1Per curiam

In response to this court’s show cause order as to why he should not be disbarred in this reciprocal discipline matter, respondent Menachem E. Lifshitz requested that his sanction be less severe, and that at any rate, the sanction be effective nunc pro tunc to November 20, 2008, the effective date of his disbarment in the State of New York. Pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 11 (d), Disciplinary Counsel recommends disbarment, to run nunc pro tunc to July 28, 2016, the date of Mr. Lifshitz’s interim suspension in this jurisdiction. For the reasons stated below, Mr. Lifshitz is disbarred, effective…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Matter of GoldbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. In Re FuchsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. In re ChagantiDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. In re GlascoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. In re KatzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API