Commercial Funding Corp. v. Melroy Const. Co.
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
The mortgage sought to be foreclosed in this suit was given by the defendant Melroy Construction Company. The only answering defendant is Florence R. Chernoff, a subsequent mortgagee who holds two mortgages, one for $11,000 and one for $2,300, both of which are expressly subject to the mortgage now being foreclosed. By her answer she sets up the defense of usury. The motion is to strike the answer and the availability of the defense of usury to this subsequent mortgagee-defendant is the only question which need now be decided. It is conceded that, as the mortgagor is a corporation, the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Berk v. Isquith Productions, Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
- Lembeck v. Jarvis Terminal Cold Storage Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1906
- Trusdell v. DowdenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1890
- Brolasky v. MillerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1852
- Vassar Holding Co. v. DunlapSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
3Cited by8 opinions
- Corradini v. v. & M. HOLDING CORP.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Fine v. H. Klein, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Selengut v. FerraraNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- Armin Corp. v. KullmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- Liebers v. Plainfield, C., Building Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.