Trusdell v. Dowden
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On motion to strike out part of the defendant’s answer.
1Opinion of the Court
Van Fleet, V. C.
This action is founded on a bond and mortgage, bearing date February 14th, 1890, made by James C. McGeragle to the complainant, whereby McGeragle bound himself to pay $5,000, with interest, at the end of four months from the date of the bond and *397mortgage. The bill alleges that McGeragle subsequently, and on ■the 18th day of April, 1890, conveyed the mortgaged premises to the defendant, subject to the complainant’s mortgage, and that the deed to the defendant contains a clause which reads as follows:
“Said premises are conveyed subject to a mortgage for §5,000, dated February…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Berk v. Isquith Productions, Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
- Commercial Funding Corp. v. Melroy Const. Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
- Heilos v. State Land Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
- Kobrin v. HullNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
- Straus v. TriboutSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938