Legal Opinion

Brolasky v. Miller

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1852PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Green, C. J.

The bill in this cause was filed to foreclose a mortgage given by James Clark and wife to Simon Brolasky, the complainant. A decree pro eonfesso was taken against Clark and wife, no appearance having been entered, or answer filed by them. Miller and Ware, the other defendants, answered. By the pleadings, it appears that Miller and Ware hold a mortgage upon the premises subsequent to the complainant’s mortgage. It also appears that the interest of Clark in the mortgaged premises, was sold at sheriff’s sale, by virtue of executions at law…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. De Wolf v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  2. Lloyd v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  3. Green v. KempMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1816
  4. Shufelt v. ShufeltNew York Court of Chancery · 1841

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Berk v. Isquith Productions, Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
  2. Commercial Funding Corp. v. Melroy Const. Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API