Bossert Corp. v. City of Norwalk
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtThim, J.
The plaintiff applied to the planning commission of the city of Norwalk for review and approval of a proposed residential development to be located in a B residence zone on a tract of land approximately 8.52 acres in area. The easterly portion of the plaintiff’s tract is on the boundary line between the city of Norwalk and the town of West-port. The proposed development is a permitted use under the building zone regulations in a B residence zone. Norwalk Zoning Regs. § 3 (A) (1929, as amended). The site plan submitted by the plaintiff provided for roads which would give access to and from two…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- RK Development Corp. v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- DeVall v. DeVallOregon Supreme Court · 1910
- Erwin M. Jennings Co. v. DiGenovaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Daly v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- J & M Realty Co. v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Winchester Woods Associates v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Cioffoletti v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- George v. CatonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
- DiBonaventura v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Schwartz v. Town of HamdenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.