Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Johnson v. Board of Supervisors

California Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1888No. 12786PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Cebtiobabi to the hoard of supervisors of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

Mrs. C. L. Tams is, and during the fiscal year 1888 has been, the owner of certain real property of the value of $142,845, situated in the city and county of San Francisco, upon which there wras and is a mortgage executed to and held by the regents of the university of California to secure the sum of $63,000. The assessor of said city and county assessed said property to Mrs. Tams for said fiscal year, at its full value, viz., $142,845, and refused to deduct therefrom the amount of said mortgage, or any part thereof. Upon application duly made to the respondent, sitting as aboard of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hollister v. ShermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Connolly v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Brenner v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Newmarker v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Webster v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Henne v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API