Legal Opinion

City of Salisbury v. Lyerly

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 26, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchencK, J.

This was an action instituted by the plaintiff city of Salisbury against George M. Lyerly, as principal, and the Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, as surety, upon certain bonds given to the city of Salisbury to secure an honest accounting of moneys coming into the hands of Lyerly. The bonds were surety not only for Lyerly but for other officers and employees of the city of Salisbury, and the position of Lyerly is therein designated as treasurer. The bonds were each conditioned as follows: “Now, therefore, if the said ‘principals’ shall, during the period beginning., and ending., well…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wallace v. . BennerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Estis v. . JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  3. Commercial Casualty Insurance v. Durham CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Gilmore v. . WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  5. Bank of Rose Hill v. GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. . McRaeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. Keith v. SilviaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Howard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
  4. Langley v. PatrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API