Legal Opinion

Bank of Rose Hill v. Graham

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 26, 1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoNNok, J.

The determinative question involved in this appeal is whether, after the execution of the bond sued on in this action, and while the same, according to its terms, was in force, the plaintiff, Bank of Rose Hill, as employer of John A. Bannerman, its cashier, made a settlement with its said employee of the loss which it had sustained by reason of his default, and which might have been made the basis of a claim under the bond against the defendant, the Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, the surety thereon. If this assistant cashier was authorized to make the settlement with its cashier,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. . McRaeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. Keith v. SilviaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. City of Salisbury v. LyerlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  4. Wilson Ford Tractor, Inc. v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API