Anderson v. . McRae
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stacy, O. J.
The record states that “his Honor did not . . . pass upon the exceptions,” and in effect that he approved the factual findings of the referee, with two slight changes, because they were “supported by the evidence.” This is not in keeping with the usual practice in such cases.
True, in a consent reference, upon exceptions duly filed, the judge of the Superior Court, in the exercise of his supervisory power and under the statute, 0. S., 578, may affirm, amend, modify, set aside, make additional findings, and confirm, in whole or in part, or disaffirm the report of a referee.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Keystone Driller Co. v. WorthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Thompson v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Wallace v. . BennerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Booker v. Town of HighlandsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Green v. CastleburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Fox v. Cramerton Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- In Re Reassignment of HayesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Worsley v. S. &. W. Rendering Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Gurganus v. McLawhornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Dent v. English Mica Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.