Legal Opinion
In re Braden
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided October 31, 2018No. Civil Action Nos.: 18-mc-0095 (RC); 18-mc-0151 (RC); Civil Action No.: 18-mc-0105 (RC); Civil Action No.: 18-mc-0140 (RC)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
In this matter, the Court finds itself in a difficult position; it has been asked to rule *85on discovery in an action overseen by a different United States district court, the Southern District of Ohio, related to the voting rights of Ohio citizens; an issue with little to no connection to Washington, D.C. Pending before the Court are five motions to quash or enforce subpoenas issued by the Southern District of Ohio seeking documents and testimony from recipients in Washington, D.C. The Plaintiffs in the underlying action-five…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re KOREAN AIR LINES DISASTER OF SEPTEMBER 1, 1983. Appeal of Plaintiffs Steering CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Perry v. SchwarzeneggerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Amer Fed Labor v. FECCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Wultz v. Bank of China, Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- State of Wyoming v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bogard Construction, Inc. v. Oil Price Information Service, LLC.District Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Bogard Construction, Inc. v. Oil Price Information Service, LLC.District Court, D. Maryland · 2022
- Honeywell International Inc. v. Law Offices of Peter T. NichollDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- In Re Motion to Compel Compliance With SubpoenaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- In Re Motion to Compel Compliance With Subpoena Directed to the United States Securities and Exchange CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.