Legal Opinion

Perry v. Schwarzenegger

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 4, 2010No. 09-17241, 09-17551PublishedCited by 112 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The opinion filed December 11, 2009 is amended, and the amended opinion is filed concurrently with this Order.

The panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc.

A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc, and the matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

Appellees’ petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc, filed December 24, 2009, is DENIED.

No further petitions for rehearing will be permitted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

OPINION

FISHER, Circuit Judge:

Propositi…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Williams v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by112 opinions

  1. National Organization for Marriage v. McKeeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  2. Hernandez v. TanninenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. In Re Motor Fuel Temperature Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2010
  4. Perry v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Mount Hope Church v. Bash Back!Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API