Legal Opinion
In Re Motion to Compel Compliance With Subpoena
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 3, 2025No. Misc. No. 2024-0152Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE: MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH Case No. 24-mc-152-ABJ-MJS SUBPOENA DIRECTED TO INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This action centers on a third-party subpoena in a heavily litigated trade-secrets dispute pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota. Petitioner Plus One, LLC (“Plus”)—plaintiff in the Minnesota action—moves to compel compliance with a Rule 45 document subpoena that it issued to Information Technology Management Services Inc. (“ITMS”). (ECF No. 1.)…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wultz v. Bank of China, Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Valle Del Sol, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Duck v. United States Securities and Exchange CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- In Re: Ubs Financial Services, Inc. of Puerto Rico Securities LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Flynn v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.