Legal Opinion

In Re Motion to Compel Compliance With Subpoena Directed to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 27, 2026No. Misc. No. 2026-0083Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH SUBPOENA DIRECTED TO THE UNITED STATES Misc. Action No. 26 - 83 (LLA) SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION MEMORANDUM OPINION Petitioners Corey Hardin and Chase Williams, co-lead plaintiffs in a putative securities class action brought in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, seek to enforce a subpoena served on Respondent U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) in the underlying action. ECF No. 1; see Am. Compl., Clifford v. Tron Found., No. 20-CV-2804 (S.D.N.Y.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Trbovich v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Fund for Animals, Inc. v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
  4. Karsner v. LothianCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  5. Friends of Animals v. Sally JewellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API