Legal Opinion

Investment Service Co. v. Martin Bros. Container & Timber Products Corp.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1970PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

The plaintiff, the assignee of the depositary bank, brought this action against the drawer of a dishonored check. The payee of a check made by the defendant drawer deposited the check in the depositary bank, which, in turn paid cheeks drawn by payee on its account against the balance created by the deposit of drawer’s check. The drawer sent a timely stop-payment order to the payor bank who, therefore, refused to honor the check when the depositary bank sent the cheek to the payor bank for collection. This action is for the sum of $2,042.21, the amount the depositary bank paid out of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of Reedsport v. HUBBARD ET UX.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Newell v. RosenbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  3. Buckman v. Hill Military AcademyOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Waltham Citizens National Bank v. FlettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. PohlOregon Supreme Court · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. South Windsor Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  2. Georg v. Metro Fixtures Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2008
  3. Richardson v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. Jahnke v. Palomar Financial CorporationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  5. Hanalei, BRC Inc. v. PorterHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API