Legal Opinion
Hanalei, BRC Inc. v. Porter
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
Decided August 10, 1988No. 12490; CIVIL NO. 85-0098)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
TANAKA, J.
Plaintiff Hanalei, BRC Inc. (Plaintiff) appeals from the summary judgment dismissing its amended complaint with prejudice. Concluding that defendant Gary S. Porter (Porter) was not entitled to a judgment as a matter of law, we vacate the judgment and remand the case for further proceedings.
FACTS
Viewing the evidence and the reasonable inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to Plaintiff, the non-moving party, Fernandes v. Tenbruggencate, 65 Haw. 226, 228, 649 P.2d 1144, 1147 (1982); Kainz v. Lussier, 4 Haw. App. 400, 406, 667 P.2d 797, 802 (1983), the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Gates Learjet Corp. v. JensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- David Neifeld v. Meyer Steinberg. David Neifeld v. Meyer SteinbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- North Branch Products, Inc., a Michigan Corporation, of Millington, Michigan v. W. Reuen Fisher, Village of Entrance, Alberta, CanadaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Guaranty Bank & Trust Co. v. DowlingConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Castellano v. BitkowerNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bank of America, N.A. v. Reyes-Toledo.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017
- City and County of Honolulu v. HsiungHawaii Supreme Court · 2005
- Romero v. Star Markets, Ltd.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1996
- Stevens v. KirkpatrickHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1996
- Bienvenue v. BienvenueHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.