Legal Opinion
School District v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 11, 1929No. Appeal 102PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Baldrige, J.,
The School District of the City of Reading entered into a contract with the Woodland Construction Company to do work and furnish materials in connection with the alteration of and addition to a school house in the City of Reading. In pursuance of a requirement in the contract, a bond was furnished with the New Amsterdam Casualty Company as surety. The condition of the bond is as follows:
“Now, therefore, the condition of this obligation is such that if the said Woodland Construction Company, Inc., shall and do well and truly in all respects comply with all the terms,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Greene County v. Southern Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Commonwealth v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- First Methodist Episcopal Church ex rel. Hall v. IsenbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Erie v. DiefendorfSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- H. H. Robertson Co. v. Globe Indemnity Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pennsylvania Supply Co. v. National Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- School Dist., Boro of Eddystone v. LewisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Scranton School District v. Casualty & Surety Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Borough of Somerset v. BarberSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Commonwealth v. Great American Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.