Legal Opinion

Erie v. Diefendorf

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 23, 1923No. Appeal, No. 205PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Moschzisker,

This is an action, in the name of the City of Erie, for the use of a materialman, to recover on a bond given to the municipality by a contractor and his surety; the latter filed an affidavit of defense in the nature of a demurrer; the court below entered judgment in defendant’s favor and the use-plaintiff has appealed.

Appellant contends that the words of the bond itself, without calling on other facts, warrant the present suit; next, that the bond can be considered, and sued on, as an obligation within the Act of May 10, 1917, P. L. 158, *33which provides…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Philadelphia v. StewartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  2. Commonwealth v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Philadelphia v. Harry C. Nichols Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  4. City of Lancaster v. FrescolnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  5. First Methodist Episcopal Church ex rel. Hall v. IsenbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Greene County v. Southern Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Atlantic Refining Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Southwestern Portland Cement Co. v. WilliamsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Commonwealth v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Commonwealth v. A. Stryker, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API