Legal Opinion

United States v. Fensterer

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 17, 1924No. 2391PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bakbeu, Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of the court:

This case involves two protests by different importers., They were hoard and decided together before the Board of General Appraisers, and also included in one appeal here.

We are indebted to counsel for a clear statement of the facts in the respective'cases, which, without their assistance would, perhaps, have been difficult for us to ascertain from the files and record in the case.

No evidence was introduced at the hearing of the protests before the Board of General Appraisers.

The protest of Fensterer & Ruhe relates, it appears, to one case of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. LippmannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  2. Bertrose Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  3. United States v. Godchaux Sugars, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  4. Jacot v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1897

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Andrews & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. Dover Shipping Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
  3. United States v. McQuadeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  4. United States v. NewmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  5. Waitt & Bond, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API