Legal Opinion

Forsman v. Holbrook

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1929No. 5202PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

This appeal is from an order denying motion for new trial.

The trial was before the court without a jury. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence, on October 13, 1927, defendant Lewiston National Bank made a motion “for judgment on the evidence.” After argument upon this motion, the court announced: “The motion of the defendant Lewiston National Bank is granted.....The judgment in favor of the defendant Lewiston National Bank is allowed.” On October 26, 1927, the court made and filed findings of fact and conclusions of law, and judgment was entered thereon. In the interim, on October 22, 1927,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith v. Faris-Kesl Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Stewart Mining Co. v. Ontario Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Buster v. FletcherIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Young v. Washington Water Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Caldwell v. WellsIdaho Supreme Court · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Warren v. SharpIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In Re the Application for Annexation of Common School Districts Nos. 18 & 21Idaho Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Roberts v. RobertsIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Wayne v. MarquardtIdaho Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API