Legal Opinion

Young v. Washington Water Power Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1924PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCARTHY, C. J.

This is an action by appellant against respondent for the flooding of his land, which he claims was caused by the maintenance of respondent’s dam. From a judgment of dismissal following a granting of a nonsuit, and an order denying a motion to strike respondent’s memorandum of costs, this appeal is taken. Of the numerous specifications of error we will expressly consider only the following: (1) The court erred in sustaining an objection to a question put to certain witnesses as to what caused the high water to stay on the land; (2) the court erred in granting the nonsuit and entering judgment…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith v. Faris-Kesl Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Donovan v. Boise CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Knauf v. Dover Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Petajaniemi v. WashIngton Water Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Brauner v. SnellIdaho Supreme Court · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Harris v. ChapmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Denton v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Hendrix v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Mason Ex Rel. Mason v. Hillsdale Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Peterson v. Universal Automobile InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API