Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re the Application for Annexation of Common School Districts Nos. 18 & 21

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1932No. 5909PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIYENS, J. —

Common School District No. 18 in Minidoka county lapsed under the provisions of chap. 215, Sess. Laws 1921, p. 427, and acts amendatory thereof, and became thereby and by reason of chap. 101, Sess. Laws 1929, part of the unorganized school district of Minidoka county.

Through the territory formerly in district No. 18 extends several miles of the main line east and west of the Oregon Short Line Railroad Company.

Thereafter, under the provisions of chap. 121, Sess. Laws 1931, p. 208, the territory formerly in district No. 18 was annexed to Independent School District No. 1 at Rupert,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Smith v. Faris-Kesl Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1915
  2. People ex rel. Taylor v. Camargo Community Consolidated School District No. 158Illinois Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Attorney General of Michigan Ex Rel. Kies v. LowreySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Pass Sch. Dist. of L.A. Cty. v. Hollywood City Sch. Dist. of L.A. Cty.California Supreme Court · 1909
  5. School District No. 8 v. Twin Falls County Mutual Fire InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1917

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Thompson v. EngelkingIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Marathon Oil Company v. WelchWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Electors of Big Butte Area v. State Board of EducationIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  4. COMMON SCHOOL DIST. NO. 2 v. District No. 1Idaho Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Roberts v. RobertsIdaho Supreme Court · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API