Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Roberts

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1948No. 7440PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HYATT, Justice.

Appellant by complaint and respondent fey cross-complaint each sought a divorce on the ground of externe cruelty. At the close of the trial, upon which both parties produced evidence, the judge after denying appellant’s motion for a non-suit as to the cross-complaint, remarked in substance that he considered it extreme cruelty for a husband to institute a divorce action against the wife charging her with improper marital conduct when he had no evidence whatsoever to justify such charge and that here there was absolutely no proof by the plaintiff of his charges. He further said:…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Norton v. City of PomonaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Stewart Mining Co. v. Ontario Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Louk v. PattenIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Corker v. CowenIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Caldwell v. WellsIdaho Supreme Court · 1909

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hayward v. YostIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  2. State v. WeiseIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Grossman v. GrossmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  4. Knudson v. Bank of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Hayward v. YostIdaho Supreme Court · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API