Legal Opinion

Krohn v. Joseph N. Smith & Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1908No. Docket No. 121PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Case by Herman Krohn against Joseph N. Smith & Company for personal injuries. There was judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This action was brought to recover for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff while in defendant’s employ. The plaintiff was employed as a polisher and buffer, and on the 6th of July, 1905, was engaged in buffing certain metal goods, and in this employment was operating a buffing' machine, the power to operate which was conveyed by a leather belt. On the day in question the belt became loose, flabby, and out of order, and the plaintiff, about 10 o’clock, notified the defendant’s superintendent, who had charge of the manufacturing for defendant corporation, that the machine and its belt…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mann v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Eligh v. GoldieMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fleur v. Michigan Alkali Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API