Legal Opinion

Fleur v. Michigan Alkali Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1913No. Docket No. 36Published

Error to Wayne; Codd, J. Case by Frank Le Fleur against the Michigan Alkali Company for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Action on the case to recover damages for a personal injury to plaintiff’s left hand on June 9, 1909, consisting of the loss of the first finger between the first and second joints, the cutting and stiffening of the second finger, the severing of the third finger close to the hand, and of the fourth finger between the two joints, thereby practically destroying the use of the entire hand. At the time of the injury complained of, the defendant operated a cooperage shop at Ford City, and while working in this shop, and While using a heading sizer saw, the plaintiff received the injury. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hough v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Illinois Steel Co. v. MannIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Roux v. Blodgett & Davis Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Lepard v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Lyttle v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API