Legal Opinion

Eligh v. Goldie

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1906No. Docket No. 163PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Bay; Shepard, J. Case by Edgar Eligh against William Goldie for personal injuries. There was judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

Plaintiff is about 50 years of age, and had worked in and about a hoop mill for several years, when he entered the employment of the defendant on or about April 1, 1902. He had done some work toward putting a machine in order which was to be used for the purpose of sawing from slabs bolts which were afterwards sawed into hoops. These slabs were pushed over a table through *597which came the circular saw which sawed the slabs into bolts. He commenced using this machine April 1st. On the 24th of April a bolt or a piece of the slab was caught upon the saw and thrown forward with great force,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Illinois Steel Co. v. MannIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Hayball v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Mann v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sheldon Handle Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  2. Krohn v. Joseph N. Smith & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API