Legal Opinion

Mann v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1900PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Lenawee; Chester, J. Case by Hiram Mann against the Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Company for personal injuries. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, C. J.

The plaintiff was in the employ of defendant for many years. For some years prior to 1893 his duties consisted, in part, in running a steam pump at Hudson. This steam pump was located in a large well, about 30 feet below the surface, and steam was transmitted to the cylinder of the steam pump through a small iron tube. The pump was set in motion a number of times a day. To start the pump, it was necessary to go down a flight of stairs, to the platform on which the pump rested. In the last of February, 1893, a change had been made in the pump. At this time the platform was so arranged that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hough v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Counsell v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  3. Harris v. HewittSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Swaim v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  2. Brouseau v. Kellogg Switchboard & Supply Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Asplund v. Calumet & Hecla Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Eligh v. GoldieMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Gorrey v. W. F. Hurd Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API