Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 2, 2006No. 1651 C.D. 2005PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge COHN JUBELIRER.

Wayne Taylor (Claimant) petitions for review from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed a decision of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) to dismiss Claimant’s Review Petition. In this petition, Claimant sought reimbursement of expenses from the Bethlehem Area School District (Employer), pursuant to Section 306(f.l)(l) of the Workers’ Compensation Act (Aet), 1 for payment of a vocational expert. We affirm.

The facts of this case, as set forth in the WCJ’s findings of fact, are not in controversy. Claimant sustained a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tobias v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Rieger v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Foyle v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Morwald v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Bailey v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Boleratz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Schriver v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Babu v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Boleratz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Boleratz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API