Legal Opinion

Foyle v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 16, 1993No. 2443 C.D. 1992PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Judge.

Patrick C. Foyle (Claimant) petitions for review of an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB) affirming a referee’s 1 decision and order which granted Liquid Carbonic I/M Corporation (Employer) a termination of benefits and concluded that Employer was not obligated to pay Claimant’s bills for treatment rendered by Claimant’s mental health counselor. We reverse in part and affirm in part.

On September 11, 1985 2 while working for Employer as an assistant plant manager, Claimant was beaten by an unknown person, sustaining a number of injuries. Pursuant to a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hebden v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Boehm v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Hebden v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Laird v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Coover v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Anzaldo v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Walk v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Boleratz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Ocasio v. OllsonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Taylor v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API